Heat transfer and flow structure around a heated cylinder by upstream installation of a grooved cylinder

dc.authoridSOYLER, MUSTAFA/0000-0003-4767-5825
dc.authoridHURDOGAN, ERTAC/0000-0003-1054-9964
dc.contributor.authorOzalp, C.
dc.contributor.authorSaydam, D. B.
dc.contributor.authorPolat, C.
dc.contributor.authorSoyler, M.
dc.contributor.authorHurdogan, E.
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-12T08:26:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentOsmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to investigate the effects of installing the grooved and smooth control cylinder upstream of a circular bare cylinder with a focus on the heat transfer and the flow structure behind the bare cylinder. The Reynolds number based on the bare cylinder diameter (D = 50 mm) is Re = 5 000. Control cylinder has a constant diameter as d = 25 mm. Flow characteristics and heat transfer were determined the varying gap space L (center-to-center distance between the bare cylinder and the control cylinder) and surface geometries. The experimental study was conducted in a water channel to collect the temperature and velocity data. Heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt number were determined by measuring the surface temperature distributions. A digital particle image velocimetry (PIV) system was also used to quantify the flow characteristics in order to assess the effectiveness of the flow control with different grooved surface (smooth, rectangular, triangular and circular grooved), in comparison with a bare cylinder case. As to the temperature measurement results, the optimum gap space was defined as L/D = 2.0. It was found that when the control cylinder is introduced, the separation point shifted downstream of the bare cylinder. The cylinders with groove geometry, however, proved to improve heat transfer in comparison to a single main cylinder. The velocity profiles in the time-averaged streamwise direction caught the peak of the single cylinder at L/D = 2.0, where the time-averaged velocity profiles of the control cylinders were minimum. The vorticity components showed that grooved cylinders were more effective in flow control, especially at L/D = 2.0, compared to a single cylinder.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects Unit of Osmaniye Korkut Ata University (OKUBAP) [OKUBAP-2019-PT3-021]; Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [TUBITAK-218 M357]; OKUBAP; TUBITAK
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Unit of Osmaniye Korkut Ata University (OKUBAP) and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) within the scope of the project, named respectively as OKUBAP-2019-PT3-021 and TUBITAK-218 M357. Thanks to OKUBAP and TUBITAK for their support.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2021.110448
dc.identifier.issn0894-1777
dc.identifier.issn1879-2286
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108060045
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2021.110448
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12502/5084
dc.identifier.volume128
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000661096700003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofExperimental Thermal and Fluid Science
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250812
dc.subjectFlow Control
dc.subjectGrooved Cylinder
dc.subjectHeat Transfer
dc.subjectPIV
dc.titleHeat transfer and flow structure around a heated cylinder by upstream installation of a grooved cylinder
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar