Is the EKC hypothesis valid in the five highly globalized countries of the European Union? An empirical investigation with smooth structural shifts

dc.contributor.authorPata, Ugur Korkut
dc.contributor.authorYurtkuran, Suleyman
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-12T08:28:34Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentOsmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzes the impact of globalization and income on ecological footprint over the period of 1970 to 2018 in the five highly globalized countries of the European Union ranked by the KOF index. To this end, the study uses a Fourier autoregressive distributed lag cointegration and Fourier Toda-Yamamoto causality methods. Studies that examine the effects of globalization on environmental degradation often neglect structural changes, which can lead to biased results. Using Fourier approximations, this study is the first to conduct an environmental assessment incorporating smooth structural changes for the five highly globalized countries of the European Union. The results show that (i) cointegration exists in Switzerland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Austria, and Denmark. (ii) The EKC hypothesis is valid for Switzerland and Denmark, while in Sweden and Austria, there is a U-shaped relationship between income and ecological footprint. (iii) The turning point at which income improves environmental quality is $68,191 for Switzerland and $46,600 for Denmark, and both countries have exceeded this per capita income level. (iv) Globalization is a factor that promotes environmental sustainability in Switzerland and the Netherlands. In order to regulate and manage environmental issues effectively, policy-makers should take advantage of economic development in Switzerland and Denmark as well as globalization in the Netherlands and Switzerland.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10661-022-10660-1
dc.identifier.issn0167-6369
dc.identifier.issn1573-2959
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid36273053
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85140347540
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10660-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12502/5504
dc.identifier.volume195
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000871190500002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250812
dc.subjectGlobalization
dc.subjectEcological footprint
dc.subjectEKC hypothesis
dc.subjectEnvironmental assessment
dc.subjectSmooth structural changes
dc.titleIs the EKC hypothesis valid in the five highly globalized countries of the European Union? An empirical investigation with smooth structural shifts
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar